IMPROVING EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF TAX OBJECTION PROCESS: LESSON LEARNED FROM JAPAN

Main Article Content

Galih Ardin

Abstract

The Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) reports that the number of tax objections and non-objection cases has increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. This number is the highest in DGT’s history. Nevertheless, the number of tax appeals earned by DGT was constantly under 50%. This fact sufficiently describes the ineffectiveness and inefficiency of tax objection processes. This study aims to explore the factors causing ineffectiveness and inefficiency of tax objection process in Indonesia and to seek alternative solutions for improvement. This research employed a qualitative method through literature study and comparative study with Japan. The reason of choosing Japan as country of comparison because this country experienced the same condition in 1970. This study found that the ineffectiveness and inefficiency of the objection process occur due to the tendency of the objection process to take side with the government. In other words, the objection process is not independent from the taxpayer's perspective. To overcome this problem, the government should establish an independent agency separated from the tax disposition authority.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ardin, G. (2023). IMPROVING EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF TAX OBJECTION PROCESS: LESSON LEARNED FROM JAPAN. Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 8(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v8i1.520
Section
Articles

References

Aritonang, J. (2020). Analisis penyebab kekalahan DJP pada sengketa pajak sehubungan dengan penetapan secara jabatan. Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara, 953-973.

Basol, E & Dogerlioglu, O. (2014). Structural determinants of organizational effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 2014(2014), 1-13, doi: 10.5171/2014.273364

Bolderston, A. (2008). Writing an effective literature review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Science, 39(2), 86-92. doi:10.1016/j.jmir.2008.04.009

Directorate General of Taxes. (2015). DGT annual report 2014. Retrieved from DGT website: https://www.pajak.go.id/sites/default/files/2019-03/AR%20DJP%202014-Eng_2.pdf

Directorate General of Taxes. (2016). DGT annual report 2015. Retrieved from DGT website: https://www.pajak.go.id/sites/default/files/2019-03/DJP%20AR%202015%20Fullpages%20-%20English%20%28Lowres%29_0.pdf

Directorate General of Taxes. (2017). DGT annual report 2016. Retrieved from DGT website: https://www.pajak.go.id/sites/default/files/2019-03/Annual%20Report%20DJP%202016%20-%20INA_0.pdf

Directorate General of Taxes. (2018). DGT annual report 2017. Retrieved from DGT website: https://www.pajak.go.id/sites/default/files/2019-03/DJP%20AR-2017%20Fullpages%20-%20English%20%28Lowres%29.pdf

Directorate General of Taxes. (2019). DGT annual report 2018. Retrieved from DGT website: https://www.pajak.go.id/sites/default/files/2020-03/Annual%20Report%202018-ENG.pdf

Directorate General of Taxes. (2020). DGT Annual Report 2019. Retrieved from DGT website: https://www.pajak.go.id/sites/default/files/2020-12/Laporan%20Tahunan%20DJP%202019%20-%20ENGLISH.pdf

Directorate General of Taxes. (2021). DGT annual report 2020. Retrieved from DGT website: https://pajak.go.id/id/laporan-tahunan-2020

Directorate General of Taxes. (2023). Organization structure. Retrieved from DGT website: https://pajak.go.id/id/struktur-organisasi

IMF (2013). How can an excessive volume of tax disputes be dealt with? Retrieved from IMF website: https://www.imf.org/external/np/leg/tlaw/2013/eng/tdisputes.pdf

Ishi, H. (1988). Historical background of the japanese tax system. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 29(1), 1–20. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43295869

Ispiyarso, B. (2019). Kelemahan lembaga keberatan pajak. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2), 248-258. doi:https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.248-258

Koro-Ljungberg, M., Yendol-Hoppey, D., Smith, J. J., & Hayes, S. B. (2009). Epistemological awareness, instantiation of methods, and uninformed methodological ambiguity in qualitative research projects. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09351980

In, J. & Lee, S. (2017). Statistical data presentation.Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70(3), 267-276. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.3.267

Kross, J., & Giust, A. (2019). Elements of research questions in relation to qualitative inquiry. The Qualitative Report, 24(1), 24-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3426

Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2019). Speech of the President of the Republic of Indonesia at the Plenary Session for the Inauguration of the Elected President and the Vice President for the 2019-2024 Period. Jakarta

Ministry of Research and High Education. (2015). The Structural and Functional Officials. Jakarta: Ministry of Reseach, Technology and High Education: Coordinating Private University Area XII.

National Tax College (2018). A Textbook on Japanese Tax Administration. Tokyo: NTC.

Palmer, S. & Torgerson, D. (2014). economic notes: Definition of efficiency. BMJ Clinical Research, 1136 – 1140.

Poskart, R. (2014). A definition of the concept of economic effectiveness. Central and Eastern European Journal of Management and Economics, 2(3), 179-187.

National Tax Agency. (2018). National tax agency report 2018. Retrieved from NTA website: https://www.nta.go.jp/english/Report_pdf/2018e.pdf

National Tax Agency. (2022). National tax agency report 2022. Retrieved from NTA website: https://www.nta.go.jp/english/Report_pdf/2022e.pdf

National Tax College (2018). A textbook on japanese tax administration. Tokyo: National Tax College

Neri de Souza, F., Neri, D. C., & Costa, A. P. (2016). Asking questions in the qualitative research context. The Qualitative Report, 21(13), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2607

Supriyadi, S., Setiawan, B., & Bintang, R. M. (2019). Evaluasi lembaga keberatan dalam penyelesaian sengketa pajak yang adil di direktorat jenderal pajak. Indonesian Tax Journal, 2(2), 6-19.

Tampubolon, K. (2013). Praktek, gugatan, dan kasus-kasus pemeriksaan pajak. Jakarta: Indeks.