ALOKASI ANGGARAN PUBLIK DAN PENGENTASAN KEMISKINAN DI PULAU KALIMANTAN
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Indikator keberhasilan pemerintah dalam pembangunan dapat dilihat melalui beberapa hal seperti rendahnya ketimpangan distribusi pendapatan dan angka kemiskinan. Kedua hal tersebut dapat dicapai melalui peran pemerintah dalam ranah kebijakan anggaran terkait alokasi pengeluaran pemerintah untuk kepentingan publik. Berangkat dari konsep dimaksud artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkonfirmasi apakah kebijakan anggaran di level pemerintah daerah di Pulau Kalimantan berpengaruh terhadap distribusi pendapatan dan kemiskinan. Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan software smartPLS versi 2 dengan memanfaatkan data panel APBD 5 provinsi dan 61 kabupaten/kota dan pemerintah provinsi dalam kurun waktu 3 tahun. Hasil analisis secara parsial menunjukkan bahwa pengeluaran pemerintah dalam bidang kesehatan, pendidikan, ekonomi, dan perlindungan sosial berpengaruh signifikan terhadap distribusi pendapatan di wilayah penelitian. Variabel kemiskinan dipengaruhi secara negatif dan signifikan oleh ketimpangan distribusi pendapatan, sedangkan variabel pengeluaran pemerintah berpengaruh negatif terhadap kemiskinan meskipun perannya terhadap pengentasan kemiskinan tidak dapat dibuktikan secara nyata.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice can be accessed here
References
Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries* Robert J. Barro, Harvard University June 1999. Harvard University, 5(June), 2–48.
Bénabou, R. (2000). Unequal societies: Income distribution and the social contract. American Economic Review, 90(1), 96–129. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.96
Bleaney, M., Gemmell, N., & Kneller, R. (2001). Testing the endogenous growth model: Public expenditure, taxation, and growth over the long run. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/0008-4085.00061
Checchi, D. (2000). Does Educational Achievement Help to Explain Income Inequality?
Coady, D., & Dizioli, A. (2017). WP/17/126 Income Inequality and Education Revisited: Persistence, Endogeneity, and Heterogeneity IMF Working Paper Fiscal Affairs Department Income Inequality and Education Revisited: Persistence, Endogeneity, and Heterogeneity.
Glomm, G., & Ravikumar, B. (1992). Public versus Private Investment in Human Capital: Endogenous Growth and Income Inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 100(4), 818–834. https://doi.org/10.1086/261841
Jianu, I. (2018). The impact of government health and education expenditure on income inequality in European Union. Theoretical and Applied Economics. Special Issue, 121–134. Retrieved from http://www.ectap.ro/supliment/international-finance-and-banking-conference-fi-ba-2018-xvith- edition/28
Keller, R. K. (2010). How Can Education Policy Improve Income Distribution?: An Empirical Analysis of Education Stages and Measures on Income Inequality. The Journal of Developing Areas, 43(2), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.0.0052
Moene, K. ., & Wallerstein, M. (2001). Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution, 95(4), 859–874.
Ospina, M. (2014). The Effect of Social Spending on Income Inequality: An Analysis for Latin American Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal, (10). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2427510
Romer, P. M., Becker, G., Shell, K., Lucas, R., Grossman, G., & Helpinan, E. (1989). Romer 1989 (1991) Endogenous technological growth, (3210).
Sylwester, K. (2002). Can education expenditures reduce income inequality? Economics of Education Review, 21(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00038-8
Ulu, M. I. (2018). The effect of government social spending on income inequality in oecd: A panel data analysis, (91104).