The Greenium Illusion? Rethinking Greenium Across Borders, Bonds, and Sukuk Markets
Abstract
Research originality – Greenium, the yield discount associated with green-labeled instruments, has drawn increasing attention as part of the global movement toward sustainable finance. Although greenium is an indicator of investors’ willingness to accept lower yields in support of environmentally advantageous projects, empirical evidence of its existence remains limited, especially across issuer types and financial systems.
Research Objectives – This study aims to assess the presence and variability of greenium across sovereign and corporate bonds and sukuk, using a dataset spanning 2015 to 2024 over various jurisdictions.
Research Methods – To provide robust insights, we employed a multi-method approach combining a twin bond analysis with the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to estimate the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) in broader samples. These techniques allowed us to directly measure matched green and other non-green instruments.
Empirical Research – Our findings indicate that greenium exists in both sovereign and corporate markets, with diverse effects seen in issuer class and industry. The results also confirm the presence of greenium in green sukuk, which implies an increasing alignment between sustainability and Islamic finance. It indicates that green labeling has the potential to reduce the cost of capital.
Implication – The study contributes methodologically by integrating comparative and matching techniques, empirically by offering cross-country and cross-instrument insights, and practically by informing green finance policies in both conventional and Islamic financial markets. We propose that future research explores the statistical and economic significance of greenium, incorporates granular ESG investor data, and examines how greenium behaves under conditions of market uncertainty.
Full text article
References
Ando, S., Fu, C., Roch, F., & Wiriadinata, U. (2023). How large is the sovereign greenium? IMF Working Paper 2023/80. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400235160.001
Arat, E., Hachenberg, B., Kiesel, F., & Schiereck, D. (2023). Greenium, credit rating, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Asset Management, 24(7), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-023-00320-5
Austin, P. C. (2009). Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine, 28(25), 3083–3107. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3697
Austin, P. C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(3), 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
Bachelet, M. J., Becchetti, L., & Manfredonia, S. (2019). The green bonds premium puzzle: The role of issuer characteristics and third-party verification. Sustainability, 11(4), 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041098
Baker, M., Bergstresser, D., Serafeim, G., Wurgler, J., Library, B., & Hall, M. (2018). Financing the response to climate change: The pricing and ownership of U.S. green bonds. NBER Working Paper Series. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3275327
Cheng, G., Ehlers, T., Packer, F., & Xiao, Y. (2024). Sovereign green bonds: A catalyst for sustainable debt market development? IMF Working Paper 23/120
Dawood, M., Feng, Z. R., Ilyas, M., & Abbas, G. (2024). External debt, transmission channels, and economic growth: Evidence of debt overhang and crowding-out effect. SAGE Open, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241263626
Dekking, F. M., Kraaikamp, C., Lopuhaä, H. P., & Meester, L. E. (2006). A modern introduction to probability and statistics: Understanding why and how. Springer Science & Business Media.
De Vincentiis, P., & Abis, D. (2025). Non-identical twins: Evidence on greenium in the German treasury bond market. Research in International Business and Finance, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103057
D’amico, S., Klausmann, J., & Pancost, N. A. (2025). The benchmark greenium. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4128109
Dorfleitner, G., Utz, S., & Zhang, R. (2022). The pricing of green bonds: external reviews and the shades of green. Review of Managerial Science, 16(3), 797–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00458-9
Ehlers, T., & Packer, F. (2017). Green bond finance and certification. BIS Quarterly Review. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3042378
Fatica, S., Panzica, R., & Rancan, M. (2021). The pricing of green bonds: Are financial institutions special? Journal of Financial Stability, 54, 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100873
Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010
Gianfrate, G., & Peri, M. (2019). The green advantage: Exploring the convenience of issuing green bonds. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219. 127-135.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.022.
Hinsche, I. C. (2021). A greenium for the next generation EU green bonds: Analysis of a potential green bond premium and its drivers. Center for Financial Studies Working Paper 663/20201. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3965664
Hyun, S., Park, D., & Tian, S. (2020). The price of going green: The role of greenness in green bond markets. The Accounting Review, 95(6), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12515
ICMA. (2021). Green bond principles. https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2021-updates/Green-Bond-Principles-June-2021-140621.pdf
IMF. (2014). Revised guideline for public debt management. IMF Policy Paper. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498343602.007
Intonti, M., Serlenga, L., Ferri, G., De Leonardis, M., & Starace, G. (2023). The “greenium” in green bonds: How did it change with COVID-19? Sustainability, 15(7), 5631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075631
Kapraun, J., Scheins, C., & Wuensche, O. (2021). (In)-credibly green: Which bonds trade at a green bond premium? Journal of Asset Management, 22, 119–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3347337
Karpf, A., & Mandel, A. (2017). Does it pay to be green? SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2923484
Kölbel, J. F., Heeb, F., Paetzold, F., & Busch, T. (2020). Can sustainable investing save the world? Reviewing the mechanisms of investor impact. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 554–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026620919202
Koziol, C., Proelss, J., Roßmann, P., & Schweizer, D. (2022). The price of being green. Finance Research Letters, 50, 103285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103285
Larcker, D. F., & Watts, E. M. (2020). Where’s the greenium? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101312
Lau, P., Sze, A., Wan, W., & Wong, A. (2022). The economics of the Greenium: How much is the world willing to pay to save the earth? Environmental and Resource Economics, 81(2), 379–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00630-5
Li, B., Wang, B., & Yu, J. (2023). The emerging greenium. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/GreenBonds_20230711.pdf
Liu, Y., Li, H., Zhou, Y., & Matsouaka, R. A. (2024). Average treatment effect on the treated, under lack of positivity. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 33(10), 1689–1717. https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241269646
Löffler, K. U., Petreski, A., & Stephan, A. (2021). Drivers of green bond issuance and new evidence on the “greenium.” Eurasian Economic Review, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-020-00165-y
OECD. (2017). Green growth indicators 2017. OECD Publishing: Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268586-en
Ostlund, N., & Le Coq, C. (2021). Is there a greenium? A meta-analysis of green bond premiums. Working Paper.
Partridge, C., & Medda, F. R. (2020). The evolution of pricing performance of green municipal bonds. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 10(1), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2019.1661187
Pastor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2022). Dissecting green returns. Fama-Miley Center Working Paper, Jacobs Levy Equity Management Center for Quantitative Financial Research Paper. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3864502
Petrova, M., & Fullbrunn, S. (2021). The pricing of green bonds: Are environmental attributes priced? Energy Economics, 95, 105138.
Pirgaip, B., & Arslan-Ayaydin, O. (2024). Exploring the greenium in the green Sukuk universe: Evidence from the primary market. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(3), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2023-0186
Preclaw, R., & Bakshi, A. (2015). The cost of being green. Index on Censorship, 53,41-43. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-cost-of-being-green-Vi%E1%BB%87t/b89d7adc6f0b59f68b2a29f29a61ed03012120a2
Saungweme, T., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2021). Public debt service in South Africa and its impact on economic growth: An empirical test. Review of Black Political Economy, 48(3), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034644620960228
Stuart, E. A., & Austin, P. C. (2015). Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine, 34(28), 3661–3679. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6607
Stuart, E. A., King, G., Imai, K., & Ho, D. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i08
Zerbib, O. D. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 98, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara dan Kebijakan Publik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice can be accessed here