Implementasi penilaian kinerja pada badan layanan umum: studi tentang komitmen, penentuan tujuan, dan harapan karyawan

Main Article Content

Ma’mun Anshori Jaka Isgiyarta Tri Jatmiko W Prabowo

Abstract

Performance assessment is a performance quality measuring tool that needed to know the level of achievement of a plan, improve the performance of the next period, as well as increased transparency and public accountability. This study aims to analyze the actors' responses to the implementation of performance assessment at RS TUV as BLU. This research uses qualitative approach, using case study research method. This study attempts to describe what the actors experienced when implementing performance assessment and exploring how the actors interpreted the experience. Data used in this research are primary data and secondary data. The data collection is done by indepth interview to the actors, observe in the working environment of the actors, and analyze the supporting documents. In this study it was found that the implementation of performance assessment was responded by the actors with commitment attitude influenced by different aspects because the actors have different ways of dealing with a phenomenon. The performance indicators of the performance assessment motivates the actors to achieve it, in accordance with Goal-Setting Theory. Performance assessment provide clarity of organizational goals, goals will tell what to do and how much effort is required. Specific objectives will lead the actors to performance improvements. Furthermore, performance improvements give rise to expectations from actors towards improved rewards system in RS TUV.


Penilaian kinerja merupakan alat ukur kualitas kinerja yang diperlukan antara lain untuk; mengetahui tingkat ketercapaian suatu perencanaan, memperbaiki kinerja periode berikutnya, serta peningkatan tranparansi dan akuntabilitas publik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis respons pelaku terhadap penerapan penilaian kinerja pada RS TUV sebagai BLU. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, dengan menggunakan metode penelitian studi kasus. Penelitian ini berusaha mendiskripsikan apa yang dialami pelaku ketika menerapkan penilaian kinerja dan menggali bagaimana pelaku memaknai pengalaman tersebut. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data primer dan data sekunder. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara wawancara mendalam (indepth interview) pada pelaku, melakukan observasi di lingkungan kerja pelaku, dan menganalisis dokumen pendukung. Berdasarkan penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa penerapan penilaian kinerja direspon oleh pelaku dengan sikap komitmen yang dipengaruhi oleh aspek yang berbeda dikarenakan pelaku memiliki cara berbeda dalam menyikapi suatu fenomena. Kemudian indikator kinerja dalam penilaian kinerja memotivasi pelaku untuk mencapainya, hal ini sesuai dengan Goal-Setting Theory. Penilaian kinerja memberikan kejelasan tujuan organisasi, tujuan akan memberi tahu apa yang harus dilakukan dan berapa banyak usaha yang diperlukan. Tujuan yang spesifik akan mengarahkan pelaku pada perbaikan dan peningkatan kinerja. Selanjutnya, perbaikan dan peningkatan kinerja memunculkan harapan dari pelaku terhadap perbaikan sistem reward yang lebih baik di RS TUV.

Article Details

How to Cite
Anshori, M., Isgiyarta, J., & Prabowo, T. (2019). Implementasi penilaian kinerja pada badan layanan umum: studi tentang komitmen, penentuan tujuan, dan harapan karyawan. Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v4i1.111
Section
Articles

References

Adams, C. A., W.-Y. Hill, dan C. B. Roberts. 1998. "Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: legitimating corporate behaviour?". The British accounting review, Vol. 30, No. 1, hlm: 1-21.
Akbar, R., R. Pilcher, dan B. Perrin. 2012. "Performance measurement in Indonesia: the case of local government". Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, hlm: 262-291.
Allen, N. J., dan J. P. Meyer. 1990. "The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization". Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, Vol. 63, No. 1, hlm: 1-18.
Argyris, C. 1977. "Organizational learning and management information systems". Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 2, No. 2, hlm: 113-123.
Atkinson, R. 1998. The life story interview: Sage.
Bartram, D., I. T. Robertson, dan M. Callinan. 2002. "Introduction: A framework for examining organizational effectiveness". Organizational effectiveness: The role of psychology, Vol., No., hlm: 1-10.
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice: Cambridge university press.
Boyne, G., J. Gould–Williams, J. Law, dan R. Walker. 2002. "Plans, performance information and accountability: The case of best value". Public Administration, Vol. 80, No. 4, hlm: 691-710.
Camp, R. C. 1989. "Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance". Pada Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance: ASQC/Quality Resources.
Carter, N. 1991. "Learning to measure performance: the use of indicators in organizations". Public Administration, Vol. 69, No. 1, hlm: 85-101.
Chariri, A. 2009. Landasan Filsafat dan Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.
Creswell, J. W., dan D. L. Miller. 2000. "Determining validity in qualitative inquiry". Theory into practice, Vol. 39, No. 3, hlm: 124-130.
Curry, A. 1999. "Innovation in public service management". Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3, hlm: 180-190.
Denzin, N. K., dan Y. S. Lincoln. 2008. The landscape of qualitative research: Sage.
DiMaggio, P. J., dan W. W. Powell. 2000. "The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields". Pada Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 143-166.
Elg, M., K. Palmberg Broryd, dan B. Kollberg. 2013. "Performance measurement to drive improvements in healthcare practice". International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 33, No. 11/12, hlm: 1623-1651.
Fay, B. 1987. "Critical social science: Liberation and its limits". Vol., No., hlm.
Fountain, J. R., T. K. Patton, dan H. I. Steinberg. 2004. "Improving performance reporting for government: new guidance and resources". The Journal of Government Financial Management, Vol. 53, No. 1, hlm: 60.
Frost, F. A., dan A. Pringle. 1993. "Benchmarking Or The Search For Industry Best‐Practice: A Survey Of The Western Australian Public Sector". Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 52, No. 1, hlm: 1-11.
Greenberg, D., J. Mazar, D. Brom, dan Y. C. Barel. 2005. "Involuntary outpatient commitment: a naturalistic study of its use and a consumer survey at one community mental health center in Israel". Med. & L., Vol. 24, No., hlm: 95.
Griffin, J. J., dan P. Dunn. 2004. "Corporate public affairs: Commitment, resources, and structure". Business & Society, Vol. 43, No. 2, hlm: 196-220.
Hay, L. E., dan J. F. Antonio. 1990. "What users want in government financial reports". Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 170, No. 2, hlm: 91.
Horvath, P., dan N. Herter. 1992. "Benchmarking: Comparison with the best of the best". Controlling, Vol. 4, No. 1, hlm: 4-11.
Hunt, S. D., dan R. M. Morgan. 1994. "Organizational commitment: one of many commitments or key mediating construct?". Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 6, hlm: 1568-1587.
Kouzmin, A., E. Löffler, H. Klages, dan N. Korac-Kakabadse. 1999. "Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors: towards learning for agency effectiveness". International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, hlm: 121-144.
Locke, E., dan G. Latham. 1994. "Goal-setting theory". chair in human resources at the State University of New York–Buffalo and was faculty director of the Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership there. Previously he was Research Professor of Management at Georgia State University. He has written over fifty books and over 135 other publications., Vol., No., hlm: 159.
Luthans, F., L. V. K. Wahl, dan C. S. Steinhaus. 1992. "The importance of social support for employee commitment: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of bank tellers". Organization Development Journal, Vol., No., hlm.
MacBryde, J., S. Paton, N. Grant, dan M. Bayliss. 2012. "Performance measurement driving change: a case from the defence sector". International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 61, No. 5, hlm: 462-482.
Mack, J., dan C. Ryan. 2003. "The perceived importance of the annual report". Queensland University of Technology Working Paper, Vol. 11, No., hlm.
Mahmudi. 2015. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Akademi Manajemen Perusahaan YKPN.
Mardiasmo. 2002. "Akuntansi Sektor Publik". Andi Yogyakarta, Januari, Vol., No., hlm.
Mathis, J., dan D. Jackson. 2004. "A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of commitment". Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 108, No., hlm: 171-194.
McAdam, R., dan L. O’Neill. 2002. "Evaluating best value through clustered benchmarking in UK local government: building control services". International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 15, No. 6, hlm: 438-457.
Mediya. 2013. Badan Layanan Umum: Dari Birokrasi Menuju Korporasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Miles, R. E., C. C. Snow, A. D. Meyer, dan H. J. Coleman. 1978. "Organizational strategy, structure, and process". Academy of management review, Vol. 3, No. 3, hlm: 546-562.
Mowday, R. T., L. W. Porter, dan R. Steers. 1982. "Organizational linkage: the psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover". Organizational and Occupational Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 3, hlm: 2008.
Nengsih, M. K., H. Handoko, dan M. Trisna. 2016. "The Influence of The Commitment, Morale, Motivation and Organization Climate of Administration Employee’s Toward Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) and It’s Impact Toward Service Quality at Bengkulu University". The Manager Review Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Vol. 15, No. 7, hlm: 931-939.
Neuman, W. L. 2013. Social Research Methods: Pearson New International Edition: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: Pearson Higher Ed.
Newstrom, J. 2012. Supervision: Managing for results: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Osbome, D., dan T. Gaebler. 1993. "Reinventing government". Reading, Massachusetts, Vol., No., hlm: 59-57.
Peters, T. J., R. H. Waterman, dan I. Jones. 1982. "In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies". Vol., No., hlm.
Prabowo, T. J. W., P. Leung, dan J. Guthrie. 2017. "Reforms in public sector accounting and budgeting in Indonesia (2003-2015): confusions in implementation". Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, hlm: 104-137.
Shende, S., dan T. Bennett. 2004. "Concept Paper 2: Transparency and Accountability in Public Financial Administration". UN DESA, Vol., No., hlm.
Speklé, R. F., dan F. H. Verbeeten. 2014. "The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance". Management Accounting Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, hlm: 131-146.
Stake, R. E. 2005. "Qualitative case studies". Vol., No., hlm.
Steers, R. M., dan L. W. Porter. 1983. "Employee commitment to organizations". Motivation and work behavior, Vol. 99, No., hlm: 441-451.
Sutikno, M. S. 2007. "Peran Guru dalam Membangkitkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa". Sumbawa Barat, Vol., No., hlm.
Torres, L., V. Pina, dan A. Yetano. 2011. "Performance measurement in Spanish local governments. A cross‐case comparison study". Public Administration, Vol. 89, No. 3, hlm: 1081-1109.
Tucker, F. G., S. M. Zivan, dan R. C. Camp. 1987. "How to measure yourself against the best". Harvard Business Review, Vol. 65, No. 1, hlm: 8-10.
Umashev, C., dan R. Willett. 2008. "Challenges to implementing strategic performance measurement systems in multi‐objective organizations: the case of a large local government authority". Abacus, Vol. 44, No. 4, hlm: 377-398.
Vaughan, D. 1992. "Theory elaboration: The heuristics of case analysis". What is a case, Vol. 173202, No., hlm.
Vroom, V. 1964. "Expectancy theory". Work and motivation, Vol., No., hlm.
Walleck, A. S., J. D. O’Halloran, dan C. A. Leader. 1991. "Benchmarking world-class performance". The McKinsey Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1, hlm: 3-24.
Wilson, J. Q. 1989. "Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it". Vol., No., hlm.
Yin, Z.-F., Y.-M. Zhou, J.-M. Yang, B. Li, W.-Y. Shao, F. Xu, Y.-L. Wang, dan D.-Q. Li. 2008. "Risk factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case-control study in China". World journal of gastroenterology: WJG, Vol. 14, No. 4, hlm: 632.
Zangaro, G. A. Year. "Organizational commitment: A concept analysis". Artikel dipresentasikan pada Nursing forum,.