Analisis Pengaruh Realisasi Belanja Pemerintah Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak di Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the effect of the realization of government spending consisting of goods expenditure, capital expenditure and employee expenditure on tax revenue in Indonesia. In this study, we use four analytical methods that consist of Granger Test, Partial Adjustment Model (PAM), Error Correction Model (ECM) and Vector Autoregression (VAR). The result shows that the realization of goods and employee expenditure are significant determinant of the tax revenue. Further examination shows that the shocks on goods and employee expenditure have a positive impacts toward tax revenue. However the shock effect are different on those variables. On the shock to goods expenditure, the tax revenue response will occur directly, in contrast to shock on employee expenditure that requires time lag. This study also find that between PAM and ECM, the ECM model is more appropriate to be used to explain the effect of government spending on tax revenue in Indonesia.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice can be accessed here
References
Anderson, W., S.Wallace, M., & Warner, J. T. (1986). Government Spending and Taxation: What Cause What? Southern Economic Journal, 52.
Baffes, J., & Shah, A. (1993). Causality and comovement between taxes and expenditures: Historical evidence from Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. Journal of Development Economics 44, 311-331.
Blackley, P. R. (1986). Causality Between Revenues and Expenditures and The Size Of The Federal Budget. Public Finance Quarterly, 14(2), 139-156.
BKF. (2019). Realisasi Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara Indonesia 2007-2017.
Ewing, B. T., & Payne, J. E. (1998). Government Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from Latin America. Journal Of Economic Development, 23, 57-69.
Fasano, U., & Wang, Q. (2002). Testing the Relationship Between Government Spending and Revenue: Evidence from GCC Countries. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, 02.
Hondroyiannis, G., & Papapetrou, E. (1996). An Examination of the Causal Relationship between Government Spending and Revenue: A Cointegration Analysis. Public Choice, 89, 363-374.
Jones, J. D., & Joulfaian, D. (1991). Federal Government Expenditures and Revenues in the Early Years of the American Republic: Evidence from 1792 to 1860. Journal of Macroeconomics, 13, 133-155.
Joulfaian, D., & Mookerjee, R. (2006). Dynamics of Government Revenues and Expenditures in Industrial Economies. Applied Economics, 23(12), 1839-1844.
Kollias, C., & Kollias, C. (2000). Tax and Spend or Spend and Tax? Empirical Evidence From Greece, Spain, Portugal and Ireland. Applied Economics, 32, 533-546.
Richter, C., & Dimitrios, P. (2013). Tax and spend, spend and tax, fiscal synchronisation or institutional separation? Examining the case of Greece. Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy, 4, 1-17.
Rosoiu, I. (2015). The impact of the government revenues and expenditures on the economic growth. Procedia Economics and Finance 32, 526 – 533.
Sriyana, J. (2009). A Causality Relationship Between Tax Revenue and Government Expenditure in Indonesia. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 93-10